When we exchange transmissions, the assignee get reset to the sender.
Which is fine when transmission occur between two organization.
In our case we use transmission to conduct internal review. Having the assignee replace is not need, because when we reply to a transmission we can assume who will be fixing the issue.
In fact the transmission is use to notify the discipline lead ( who is the sender) we assign the task to one of his member.
Practical use of functionality?
We conduct internal review using PWDM, as such we do not need to reassign the issue to the sender. |
|
What is the impact of not doing this?
each time we send back a transmission we have to re-re-assign the correct ressource. |