A new version of a transmittal was sent, then recall without prior responses being communicate.
That recall version is mark as the current version.
In such situation, the recall transmission without response, should not be mark as current version or supersede, but mark as obsolete ( in managneta for example)
Practical use of functionality?
A transmission without responses should not be the active one as we have no responses and the fact that it was recal indicate that the information is no longer validate or relevant. |
|
What is the impact of not doing this?
This could cause confusion, letting people think it is still valid even if being recall ( kind of mix message) |
Thanks you for your idea. We may look to address this issue with a more configurable workflow approach in future. I will mark this as future consideration, however this wont be something we will look to address within PWDM within the short-term.