Problem: hello, in the custom attributes that we can setup on the transmittal, RFI and general correspondence we have created items that need to be tracked and logged within the system. But the only way to review the fields is either by exporting ...
Recalling a responded/closed transmittal must require confirmation first from the recipient before it proceed
It is understandable that there may be cases wherein responded/closed Transmittal might still need to be recalled, but said recall must be agreed first by both the sender and the recipient. This can be done by adding the process wherein the recipi...
We have a need to recall individual document from a transmission. We send 50 documents in a transmission and 5 of them need to be recall to be resend as part of another package or in a new version of the same package OR simply because they are no ...
DM Review Markup "ISSUE" Tool not exporting as a comment
The current "Note" tool in the Deliverables Management Review does not allow users to attach a comment to the note (see screenshot 1), only presenting the option to create an "Issue". The problem with the "Issue" function is that when the response...
is it possible to see the approval status of the documents like A, B, C, or D status, instead of seeing only "Acknowledged" and "Responded" on the landing page of the syatem.
A certain drawing cannot be searched as it is issued through drawing submittal sheet.
Unable to search using document reference number unless it is mentioned on the subject of the submission.
In deliverables, new versions of a transmittal are currently listed alphabetically. There should be an option to list them numerically so that they can align with the established coding in the company or project.
1
Will not implement